Prior to the passage of the Alimony Reform Act of 2011, retirement alone would not have impacted a payor’s financial obligations to her former spouse. That changed on September 26, 2011 when the Governor signed into law House Bill 3617. Now, G.L., c. 208, § 49 provides that “once issued general term alimony orders shall terminate upon the payor attaining the full retirement age.” Full retirement age depends on the year in which the payor was born. The table below, published by the Social Security Administration helps guide this determination:
Full Retirement By Year Of Birth
|
Year of Birth |
Full Retirement Age |
|
1937 or earlier |
65 |
|
1938 |
65 and 2 months |
|
1939 |
65 and 4 months |
|
1940 |
65 and 6 months |
|
1941 |
65 and 8 months |
|
1942 |
65 and 10 months |
|
1943-1954 |
66 |
|
1955 |
66 and 2 months |
|
1956 |
66 and 4 months |
|
1957 |
66 and 6 months |
|
1958 |
66 and 8 months |
|
1959 |
66 and 10 months |
|
1960 and later |
67 |
Actual retirement is not required and need not be shown. Indeed, the presumptive termination of general term alimony is purely a function of age. While the Court can extend alimony past a payor’s full retirement age, her ability to work thereafter is not a reason, standing alone, to extend it. The recipient must demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence, and the Court must find, “good cause” to do so. What qualifies as “good cause” has not yet been judicially determined, but would likely include an extreme disparity in incomes and earning capacities based on unforeseen medical conditions.
Enforcing Judgments and the Contempt Powers of the Court.
Considerations when challenging prenuptial Agreements
My prior spouse is unemployed. Can and will the court impute income to her?
How does retirement impact my financial obligations to my prior spouse?
Are premarital and gifted assets divisible upon divorce?